《中国糖尿病杂志》官方网站

20

您的位置:首页 > 中国糖尿病杂志 > 2013年 > 1期

不同方法检测2型糖尿病外周血管疾病差异性的比较

来自:中国糖尿病资讯网  编辑:editor|点击数:|2013-01-18

  【摘要】目的 探讨经皮氧分压(TcPO2)、踝肱指数(ABI)、彩色超声多普勒在T2DM患者外周血管疾病(PVD)中的诊断价值。 方法 入选患者分别行TcPO2、ABI、彩色超声多普勒检查,用敏感性、特异性、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线等评估3种检查方法的诊断效果。 结果 TcPO2、ABI、彩色超声多普勒的敏感性分别为0.917、0.792、0.854,特异性分别为0.663、0.897、0.873,ROC曲线下面积分别为0.791、0.549、0.675。 结论 3种检查方法诊断性能各有优劣,临床上可结合使用。

  【关键词】糖尿病;外周血管疾病;检测方法

  Comparison of different methods for detection of peripheral vascular diseases JIN Xing, CHEN Ying-yue, SHEN Yun, et al. Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Nanjing Hospital, Nanjing 210006,China

  Corresponding author: WU Jin-dan, Email: wujindandan@sina.com

  【Abstract】Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2), ankle-brachial index (ABI), and color Doppler ultrasound in T2DM patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Methods The enrolled patients were detected by TcPO2, ABI, and color Doppler ultrasound respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, etc. were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each detecting method. Results The sensitivity of TcPO2, ABI, and color Doppler ultrasound was 0.917, 0.792, and 0.854 respectively, the specificity was 0.663, 0.897, and 0.873 respectively, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.791, 0.549, and 0.675 respectively. Conclusions Each of the three detection methods has its own advantages. It’s better to use them in combination clinically.

  【Key words】 Diabetes; Peripheral vascular disease; Detection methods

上一篇:2型糖尿病血浆护骨素浓度与内皮依赖性血管舒张功能的关系 下一篇:使用动态血糖监测比较地特胰岛素与甘精胰岛素联合门冬胰岛素强化控糖后2型糖尿病患者的血糖波动情况